• TheNews International
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss

They weren’t soldiers on the front line

Vengeance would not bring us peace, only the hope of a just and non-violent future would

They weren’t soldiers on the front line

We call them our ‘sacrifices.’ We call them our martyrs. We call them our little heroes. We use them as our battle cry against the Taliban, or the extremists, or the people of Waziristan, or really anyone whom in our anger, we deem responsible.

But the 131 dead children of Peshawar are not our sacrifices, and they are not our martyrs. Their deaths are not deliberate events designed to further a cause. They are the unfortunate victims of crime that is malevolent beyond words. Their deaths are not meaningful, but are a meaningless waste of life.

So please, let’s stop calling them, and so many of the other lives that have been lost in bomb blasts and target killings, Martyrs. Those were not soldiers on the front line fighting for their country. They were someone’s innocent children too young to even be party to the conflict in which they became ‘sacrifices.’

But more than that, let’s stop using these poor children as a battle cry against the Taliban. Let’s stop talking avenging their deaths and bringing hell down on the extremists and other significantly more barbaric nonsense like giving the Taliban a taste of their own medicine and executing every terrorist on death row. Because it will not bring those 131 bereaved mothers any satisfaction. It will not bring their children back. The helplessness and brokenness that they feel is beyond our abilities to heal.

So today, we are faced with a choice. We could go down the path of vengeance, which will lead to only more death. Just like the Taliban killed those 131 children in vengeance for Zarb-e-Azb, we will kill scores of men, women and children (as the air strikes being carried out in response to the incident are doing at the moment) in Waziristan. Do we imagine this will cause them to surrender and then we will build a bright beautiful world anew?

Of course, not.

All it will lead to hate festering deeply in the hearts of an otherwise peaceful, nonviolent people on both sides. And, all that will lead to is more reprisals and counter-reprisals and counter-counter-reprisals. In the process, the tragedy at Peshawar will be repeated over and over. It will not end until one side is wiped out down to the last man.

But that is unlikely, and will not happen before the butcher’s bill enters the tens, if not hundreds, of thousands. And, when do we want to be responsible for the extermination of a people just to make sure our ‘sacrifices’ are not in vain?

Or, we could choose to put our anger aside and try and make sure something like this does not happen again. That will involve holding our understandably eager trigger fingers and not shooting at anything that moves in Waziristan. It will involve accepting that we’ve made many of the mistakes that have led to the formation of an organisation as extreme and malevolent as the TTP.

And, perhaps hardest of all, it will involve having to accept many of the people we perceive to be responsible for this tragedy (some factions of the Taliban, the people of Waziristan in general) will not be marched to gallows, but will have to accepted back into our society without prejudice.

That’s not to say that violence is necessarily wrong. It will almost certainly play a part in whatever becomes of Waziristan. But violence should be used as a tool to leverage negotiations, and that too only against those actively engaged in violent activity against the state, not anyone who happens to hold a different view than our own, however despicable we may find that view.

Put simply, the fact is that dead children are not conducive to reconciliation. But if you ask anyone who has lost a loved one to terrorism (as many, many Pakistanis, including myself, have), they will tell you that vengeance does not bring you peace, only the hope of a just and non violent future does.

And, if we are to make sure that no one else should lose a child, or indeed a parent or a spouse or anyone at all, to mindless violence like that in Peshawar, then reconciliation is our only hope, however unpleasant or painful we may find it.

Asad Zafar

asad zafar final
The author is a student of Aitchison College, Lahore.

4 comments

  • Are Taliban doing all these things? What has made Taliban doing these things? How can a man who does not harm other children of other schools enters Army Public School and start firing on whatever he sees? All these questions lead all of us to one common thinking, i.e, there must be something in the attackers mind due to which they did all such things. What is that thing in their mind, now listen carefully.
    1. When USSR enters Afghanistan, Tribal people are encouraged by the Pakistani Establishment to give shelter to Mujaheddin from all across the world in Waziristan. The state of Pakistan sponsors those people to wage Holy War Jihad against USSR. The people doing Jihad against USSR are given a full back up and support by Pakistani nation. The Pakistani media portray them as heroes. Ok, lets go ahead.
    2. When the same country Afghanistan is raided by USA, and the same people in Waziristan now consisting of foreign Mujaheddin (who were once sponsored by Pakistani State) again cross the border to attack American Troops.
    3. What is the difference between Para 1 and Para 2?. In the first case there is a full support to the same people against USSR, while in the second case there is no support or even there are army operations against these people in the same tribal areas. Not only the state of Pakistan says anything to USA (as compared to USSR) in Afghanistan , rather it provides full fledge support to USA on the order side of the border.
    4. In the second case when there took military operations on the request of foreign masters, the same people whom the state of Pakistan once declared their heros, turn their guns on the state of Pakistan.
    5. In all these operations done by Pakistani state, there is hardly any distinction made between any one good and bad. All are treated with the one eye. There is no consideration given to the innocent people, who are just made homeless in a big quantity of more than a million.
    6. American crafts entering Pakistan are not shot. Drones are condemned but not destroyed by Pak Airfroce.
    7. Pakistani nation is told by War correspondents and defence analysts of Pakistan that USA is our enemy, while there is no one who can ask those correspondents what the hell your COAS was doing then in USA for more than a week?
    — WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL THIS?–
    THE STATE OF PAKISTAN WHO CREATED TALIBAN OR THE TALIBAN?

    • you have a very valid point that it is the state of pakistan that created taliban, and our state’s policies towards Fata have not been ideal.

      But that does not mean that we do not put blame where it is due. past mistakes do NOT give taliban or like-minded people any kind of pass to commit these massacres and then expect us to be sympathetic to what happened to them.

      This is war. period.

  • Beautifully written. I have lost loved ones too and revenge doesn’t fill the gap. it never will. only the sense that next time something like this won’t happen, could bring any kind of solace

  • You don’t know at all who these Talibaan are. If they were created by Pakistani establishment and operating on their direction then how can they turn against them? If they have been now adopted by someone else then it means they are sell-able commodity, those controlling them now are paying them more. Nobody has killed their children, which u r hinting at. They are wild beasts they have to be finished.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 characters available

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Scroll To Top